Long-range Iranian drones - not ballistic missiles - have exposed the most dangerous capability gap in the defense postures of the Gulf states, missile technology researcher Fabian Hoffmann has warned. Individual Shahed-type drones have "repeatedly penetrated defenses and struck military and symbolic targets, including the U.S. embassy in Riyadh," he writes - a result that "overall does not reflect well on U.S. and allied militaries."
The core problem is structural, Hoffmann argues in his Missile Matters analysis, as reported by "Hvylya": neither the Gulf states nor the United States deploy "optimized interceptor systems in sufficient numbers" to counter the drone threat. Instead, they rely primarily on manned aircraft to intercept incoming Shahed-type drones - an approach that has proven insufficient.
The vulnerability stands in stark contrast to the relatively strong performance of regional ballistic missile defenses. While interceptor stockpiles were strained, the combined U.S. and Gulf defense architecture has managed to blunt Iran's ballistic missile campaign, which has declined sharply in intensity. Drones, however, continue to get through.
Hoffmann notes that the Gulf states had "already begun trying to address this gap in the years before the war, drawing lessons from Ukraine's experience against Russia and noticing Iran's diverse long-range drone arsenal." But procurement cycles proved too slow to field adequate systems before the conflict began.
The gap is particularly significant given that Iranian ballistic missile usage has dropped dramatically since the opening days of the war, while drone attacks continue. With Iran's TEL fleet under sustained attack from U.S. and Israeli forces, drones may increasingly become Iran's primary means of striking at its adversaries across the region.
Also read: "There Is No Plan B": Foreign Policy Analysts Expose a Fatal Flaw in U.S. Military Doctrine