Half or more of US naval assets are now in the Gulf, a quarter were at one point deployed to Venezuela, and a substantial share of American air power is committed to the Iran campaign. Yet Gen. David Petraeus said none of that changes the fundamental strategic reality: the Indo-Pacific is "where the relationship that matters more than any other in the world - or all the others put together - is at hand."

Petraeus described the US-China dynamic as the defining strategic relationship of the era, "Hvylya" reports, citing his CSIS conversation. He referenced the characterization by a former National Security Advisor who called it "severe competition" and said the US must ensure it "will never erupt into actual conflict because the effect on the global economy would be catastrophic."

Petraeus acknowledged that the US is "keeping a lot of plates spinning simultaneously" - Iran, Russia, Venezuela, the broader Middle East. But he said one plate "is bigger than all the others put together," and that is the US-China relationship. The risk of losing focus is real, with the Iran campaign consuming interceptor stockpiles and tying down major force elements far from the Pacific.

The lessons from Iran and Ukraine should be feeding directly into Indo-Pacific preparedness, Petraeus argued. He said the US needs to turn concepts like the "hellscape" vision for Taiwan defense into actual operational capability that "underwrites deterrence there even more effectively than we have so far." Deterrence, he said, is a function of two elements: a potential adversary's assessment of your capabilities and your willingness to use them. "We need to ensure that both of those elements are rock solid," he said.

Both Washington and Beijing appear aware of the stakes. Petraeus noted that a US-China summit is planned in Beijing within approximately a month, and both sides are exercising caution to keep it on track. The US has delayed announcing a $12-plus billion arms sale to Taiwan, while China is showing "some degree of similar restraint." But restraint driven by summit diplomacy is not the same as structural stability - and Petraeus's core message was that no crisis elsewhere should distract from building the latter in the Pacific.

Also read: China Controls 98% of a Mineral the U.S. Military Desperately Needs After Iran Strikes